I don’t see how heterosexuals have the right to bar any unions. After all, the largest divorce settlement in recent history just occurred because Tiger is a cheetah and Elin’s freedom and silence are worth the equivalent of a small country’s gross domestic product.
If we really want to preserve the endangered traditional marriage, perhaps we shouldn’t ban same-sex marriage, but consider putting Katharine Hepburn’s thoughts about co-habitation into American law. The grande dame is said to have wondered whether men and women really suit each other. “Perhaps they should live next door and just visit now and then,” she quipped.
That’s the arrangement settled on by Helena Bonham Carter and Tim Burton, who rather infamously have lived next door to each other for almost their entire partnership (they say because of his snoring). Such an approach to coupledom might appeal to realtors, but it’s hardly a practical solution for the rest of us – though I can’t help but dream of it everyone once in a while.
Truthfully, I don’t understand the fear of gay marriage. Could it be that married heterosexuals who condemn same gender unions believe that if everyone gets a chance to ride the marriage-go-round, the institution’s legitimacy will somehow be diminished? Have they not seen “The Bachelor”? The first time I saw this “reality” show, I truly believed it was a farce. Eight seasons later, the joke is on me because there is absolutely no underlying meaning — other than America just loves segment producers picking a spouse for educated white people. (Of course viewers loathe any third world family that attempts to pick an acceptable spouse for a child, but maybe that’s because arranged marriages aren’t on network television.)
Are conservatives afraid that two male or two female partners would take marriage lightly? More lightly than the five celebrities I can think of who married and divorced within the same year — and the three I can recall who married and divorced within the same weekend in Vegas? Given that among heterosexuals, American marriages end in divorce more than 40 percent of the time, shouldn’t we welcome gays and lesbians who are not only excited to embrace traditional marriage, but committed to making it work? At the very least, America’s embarrassing divorce rate could lower, making matrimony more revered and not less.
Or do right-wingers fear the straight population would be shocked and ashamed when the world sees how much fun marriage might be if it didn’t include the obligatory opposite-gender-based warfare? Ah, those battles with my husband who never throws out socks, underwear or T-shirts. Or the tiffs about him beating the tube of toothpaste down to its most anorexic state before discarding it. Or the endless skirmishes over his habitual displays of pocket change or restaurant matches in glass bowls because he mistaken believes they contribute to our home décor.
Wait a minute, if both members of a married couple are the same sex, is there any chance that both would be able to see the dishwasher is right next to the sink and fill the appliance and dare I dream – actually run it? If so, I’d bet the energy they don’t waste in dirty-dishes disputes could be put to more amorous use. I would really envy that.
I don’t actually believe that Kate Hepburn meant all men are messy and all women are June Cleaver and therefore should live apart. If that was the case, men could just take all their trash to the garage – like Jesse James. But considering how painful and palpable infidelity is in marriage – and working our way down to Mel Gibson’s behavior – maybe we could begin a dialogue about what is important to keep traditional unions alive, by honoring requests from people who really want to be a part of the institution. What if the newcomers to the state of matrimony actually reminded us all why it should be held up to our highest regard?
I realize that many of you reading this might embrace a religious proscription on marriage between anyone other than a man and a woman. But exclusionism seems like a Christian value of long ago. No nomadic tribe of gay lovers are coming to your state to take your marriage down. Rather, inclusion for all types of family, feels like the first step towards honoring so many lessons in every religious dogma. Maybe we could all learn something from a couple that has had to virtually part the red sea to make their own version of Ozzie and Harriet come true.
(Diane Farr is known for her roles in “Californication,” “Numb3rs” and “Rescue Me,” and as the author of “The Girl Code.” You can read her blog at getdianefarr.com, follow her on twitter.com/getdianefarr or contact her on facebook.com/getdianefarr.)
COPYRIGHT © 2010 DIANE FARR
DISTRIBUTED BY TRIBUNE MEDIA SERVICES, INC.






My sister and I are for same sex marriage. Our mom and dad? Not so much. They’re so 1950s.
I’m from Virginia and I’m pissed that they won’t do same sex marriages or grant same sex marriage licenses. It seems Virginia is such a Republican state.
i would estimate Virginia might be last, or second to last after Alabama to be taken care of the disenfranchised. In 1967 Virginia was ordered to remove a law banning interracial marriage after the Loving couple (that really is their name) was arrested for buying a home together. The supreme court win for the couple changed the law across the country but did not make out of law actual physical law in the state of Virginia for another ten years. Mildred Loving recently spoke to support marriage equality for all. df
The question could be asked “why bother with marriage at all?” Why should a religous (or otherwise) ceremony symbolise two peoples’ love and devotion to each other regardless of their sexuality. Is marriage not just a symbol of peer pressure ? The amount of conversations friends (both male and female) of mine have endured along the lines of….. “Oh, so you’re in your 30s and not married… how come?” or to remove the thinly veiled cloak “Oh, so you’re in your 30s and not married… what’s wrong with you?”. That most of these people have been in long term, loving and stable relationships without feeling the need to put themselves into a debt the size of a third world country just so that appearances can be kept, their friends can eat, drink and make out with each other, and they can enjoy the most expensive holiday they’ve ever had should be applauded !
What we really need is some simply legal terminology which protects the rights of a couple (regardless of sexuality) should something “nasty” and unforeseen happen…. like death!
Either way, loved the piece Diane….. keep writing them
Yes, I read about their story. Took a long time to finally allow interracial marriage. I’m down with same sex marriage and interracial marriage.
The first time I saw a bumper stick that said “marriage is only for the faithful” or something saying (we hate gays) I swear I almost rammed my car into their car
How did Prop 8 fail in California. Seriously?
This is just another example of America being the last hold out for progressive change. For such a civilized developed country we sure do move slow. does the religious right really think we might become Nazarathe again??
Bill
You are a really funny writer. I hope you don’t get yelled at for this.
Thanks for writing your thoughts Steve. I lived in NZ for a while and everyone called themselves “partners” there. dating, living together, married and of any sex union. it was really, really inspiring and freeing. and it just felt great. I think we are a ways away from that. but i’m sure a marriage at city hall in blue jeans would afford you all the protection you need and you wouldn’t have to even admit to succumbing to the pressure you might feel – you would just have your security incase of something catastrophic. Either way, thanks again for sharing.
Oh Julie. I can honestly say I had a similar reaction. I was driving and saw a “Get out of our club” bumber sticker of some sort saying we don’t want gay people to marry and I actually changed lanes to see what a person that not only thinks this looks like – but is insane enough to drive around the westside of Los Angeles with such an antagonizing sign on their car. clearly they are not leaving that vehicle in the parking lot of whole foods.
the female driver looked human…2 eyes, 2 hands, and one head but – i was “prayed for her” that no one was going to throw a feather boa around those body parts and make out with a same gendered friend in front of her. DF
LB – makes you wonder if we thought everyone in the state was actually blue…
is Nazarathe where Newt Gingrich is from?
thank you Andrea. I wake up everyday with that hope. df
Diane, have you heard about this story down in Louisiana that the justice of the peace denied a marriage license to an interracial couple? http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/15/interracial-couple-denied_n_322784.html
I would marry my Korean boyfriend in a heartbeat.
[...] Original post: Same Sex Marriage is on its Way, Like it or Not | click here to … [...]
it was very interesting to read getdianefarr.com
I want to quote your post in my blog. I can?
And you et an account on Twitter?
thank you Ir ra man
Yes and I think yes. twitter/getdianefarr
C’mon Diane everyone knows that supporting gay marriage means you are secretly gay.
Do you remember me Diane?
Oh, yes, Albert, I forgot to mention that fear. you are right! df
Perfect summer reading. great article Diane.
I’m going to forward this to all my family in Kansas who are just as conservative as Nicole’s in Virginia. You make great arguements. I’ll let you know what they say. (like i can’t imagine already.)
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/15/interracial-couple-denied_n_322784.html The Justice of the Peace is a jerk not marrying an interracial couple.
Diane, it takes a while to get around to reading my emails sometimes…but your “take” on things is always worth the time. When our baby-time-together ends
, at least I’ll have the means to keep in touch with you intellectually. This particular post is a very important topic to our family, and I thank you for taking time to put your incisive and entertaining scalpel to it!
Hello Diane,
I just finished my surprise in August, by going to your blog. If you’re interested, check out the 31st August, on my blog and look for surprises. I hope you will enjoy. I wish you good health and happiness.
Radka
I’m happy about the Prop 8 ruling.
What a great story. so many great points. did you see the overturn in California today?
I will check it out. thanks Radka
Let’s hope it doesn’t have to go to the Supreme Court, where law is no longer practiced but party politics is fought out in the name of law.
hello techno jo. i did see it and was so thrilled. i hope it will stay at the supreme court so that it might stick. df
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/15/interracial-couple-denied_n_322784.html The Justice of the Peace is a jerk not marrying an interracial couple.
And this is in Louisiana.
Could same-sex marriage ruling change Virginia law? http://articles.dailypress.com/2010-08-05/news/local-virginia-gay-marriage-0806-20100805_1_same-sex-marriage-ban-on-gay-marriage-man-and-one-woman
Virginia voters approved the constitutional amendment affirming marriage as between one man and one woman by a tally of 57 percent to 43 percent. I hope the Supreme Court opines the ruling. Come on, Virginia. Change your mind.
Va. joins nine states in gay-marriage opposition http://hamptonroads.com/node/570424